| 
           | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
            
                      
             |   
          
          
          
          New Delhi, March 3 (IANS) In the latest blow to the Manmohan   Singh government, Central Vigilance Commissioner P.J. Thomas quit Thursday after   the Supreme Court struck down his appointment for his alleged involvement in a   corruption scandal and raised the issue of "institutional integrity".Six months   after the Kerala bureaucrat was named as head of the country's anti-corruption   watchdog, the Supreme Court said the appointment by a high-powered panel,   consisting of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Home Minister P. Chidambaram and   opposition leader Sushma Swaraj, did not exist in law. |  Responding to the ruling, Manmohan Singh said: "I respect the court judgment and   I will speak in the house." 
 Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Sushma   Swaraj had placed her opposition to his appointment on record at a Sep 3, 2010   meeting. But the government overruled the opposition and appointed him to the   post.
 
 An apex court bench headed by Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia was giving   its verdict on a petition by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL)   challenging Thomas' appointment.
 
 The petitioner had said that Thomas, a   1973 batch Indian Administrative Service officer of Kerala cadre who was earlier   the telecom secretary, was facing a criminal chargesheet in a case related to   palm oil import in Kerala and that he was not an "outstanding civil servant of   impeccable integrity".
 
 "We are not in any position to say anything now.   He has tendered his resignation and the Supreme Court also held his appointment   illegal," Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily told reporters.
 
 He denied that   the order had left the government red faced as the appointment was made by a   panel of which opposition leader Sushma Swaraj was a part.
 
 Thomas was   Kerala's civil supplies secretary in 1992 when the alleged palm oil scam took   place.
 
 A case was registered in 1999, accusing Thomas and others of   criminal conspiracy and causing a loss of Rs.2.32 crore to the exchequer. They   were accused of importing 15,000 tonnes of palm oil from Malaysia at an inflated   price for distribution through fair price shops.
 
 The apex court said   institutional integrity and functioning were more important than personal   integrity though both were related.
 
 It said it was incumbent upon the   high-powered committee to keep in mind the institutional integrity while making   the recommendation of the CVC and it should be according to the law.
 
 The   ruling - the latest blow to the government fighting a series of corruption   scandals, including on the allocation of 2G spectrum and the Commonwealth Games   - provided the opposition just the ammunition it was looking for.
 
 The BJP   and the Janata Dal-United (JD-U) said the Supreme Court decision was a victory   against corruption. They called for Chidambaram's resignation on moral grounds.
 
 "As home minister, his duty was to present the right facts but they   concealed facts on the allegations against Thomas," BJP leader Murli Manohar   Joshi said outside parliament, where the budget session is in progress.
 
 "Even when (Sushma Swaraj) brought it to their notice that Thomas' name   was involved in a corruption case, they ignored it," he said.
 
 Toeing the   same line, Janata Dal-United leader Sharad Yadav said the step was a victory for   the movement against corruption.
 
 "The home minister should take moral   responsibility and resign. The removal of CVC is a victory for the movement   against corruption," he said.
 
 Communist Party of India leader D. Raja   said: "It was a government elected CVC as the main opposition party was opposed   to him, so it is a blow to the government."
 
 Communist Party of   India-Marxist (CPI-M) leader Sitaram Yechury added that the prime minister must   explain the government's stance.
 
 "The prime minister needs to answer in   parliament how they went ahead despite all the facts known to everybody... even   the leader of opposition objected. They have to answer. He needs to explain,"   said Yechury.
 
      
     comments... |  
   |