| 
 | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
            
                      
             |   
          
          
          
          I recently gave a lecture to undergraduate students at my alma mater, Indian   Institute of Technology-Kanpur. A day before my lecture, the students had   arranged for a bull session at night with the residents of one hall, where I   stayed for three years during my undergraduate days in the late 1960s. Most of   them complained that after passing the toughest exam in the world, called Joint   Entrance Exam or JEE, they felt let down since they were not challenged or   inspired by IIT teachers. 
 
 |  The teachers said the students do not read or attend classes and are just not   interested in studies any more. I think the truth lies somewhere in   between.
 A spate of news items have come up about how the IITs are   slipping and that IIT students are not up to the mark. A deeper analysis will   reveal that it is not the students' fault since they are not being guided   properly.
 
 In the last couple of years, I have interacted with students   not only at the IITs, NITs, management institutes, etc, but also in schools and   colleges in rural towns. And everywhere I have found bright kids who want to do   something worthwhile. Being better informed via the electronic media like cell   phones, internet and social networks, they know what exists in the world and   want to be a part of it.
 
 An entry into the IIT is a passport to success.   This is based on the past history of IITians getting plum jobs in IT, banking   and other fields. The JEE is a great filtering mechanism. Passing it is no mean   achievement because even the faculty of IITs cannot do it in the time allotted.   Thus saying that most of the students who nowadays get into the IITs are zombies   is not correct. Yes, the JEE can be improved by having an extra question paper   on languages and an aptitude test.
 
 The reason why the IITs were set up   was to create excellent engineers and technologists for India. That basis has   failed since the majority of IIT graduates go for non- engineering jobs such as   management, banking and civil services.
 
 The teaching in IITs has been   deteriorating for the last 20-30 years and is quite mediocre, with most of the   faculty not up-to- date in engineering research. Research and teaching go hand   in hand because the excitement of new research is then passed on to the   students. Since the research quality in IITs is much below world standards, the   teachers are not able to inspire students. The students therefore look for other   challenges and opt for non-engineering jobs.
 
 Four years of IIT education   is a sufficiently long time. The fact that only a handful of students who pass   out every year opt for engineering or research careers shows that very little of   good engineering is taught.
 
 The teenaged brain (most IITians are in this   age group) needs a huge amount of inputs to be challenged. Thus the onus is on   the teachers to provide it. And part of that comes by expecting excellence and   feedback from students. This can be in the form of regular homework and exciting   hands-on projects which most IIT teachers do not give and, even if that is   given, it is never graded and supervised properly. Thus the student never knows   whether he or she has learnt anything in the course.
 
 Almost in every IIT,   around 50 percent of faculty positions are vacant. The government in its wisdom   thinks giving higher pay will help attract good faculty. This is a myth because   great teachers are not attracted only by pay but by the scholarship environment   of doing good research and teaching. Thus this is an egg and chicken story.   Great institutes produce a good number of great researchers, some of whom also   become great teachers.
 
 Also some of the problems with IIT education have   been created by IT companies. In the past, these companies have heavily   recruited from IIT campuses. In fact, not long ago there used to be a saying   "anything that moves in IIT gets a job in Infosys"! This resulted in making most   students complacent and bunk classes since they knew they would be taken by IT   companies, irrespective of their grades. With this attitude it becomes very   difficult for students to learn anything.
 
 It is not that all the existing   teachers are bad. Quite a few have inspired students to do great things. A   recent example is of micro satellite, Jugnu, designed and fabricated by   undergraduate students at IIT Kanpur that was recently launched successfully by   the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). About 35 students worked day and   night for three years to produce it. Besides, most of the students working on   it, after graduation, have opted for careers in engineering and   start-ups.
 
 But these efforts are few and far between. Imagine what many   more Jugnu-type efforts in different fields could do for the country. It will   not only produce excellent technologies but also create scientists and engineers   that India really needs.
 
 I also feel the IIT alumni should lecture   students regularly. There should be a mechanism whereby IITs actively seek and   invite successful alumni to lecture at institutes on a regular basis.
 
 In   survey after survey, IITs are nowhere in the top 200 universities of the world.   It is a shame because some of its alumni are top achievers all over the world.   What is needed is great teachers, researchers and inspirers to egg these   students on to do good engineering so that they can contribute to the society   and nation.
 comments... |  
   |