|  | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
                       |   
          
          
          
          Patna,(BiharTimes): In a rare move the   Patna high court bench of Justice A Amanullah on Tuesday summoned Siwan   Fast-Track Court-I judge, Ram Darash, for acquitting the dissident RJD MP from   Maharajganj, Uma Shankar Singh, and his son Jitendra Swami in a murder case   whose transfer petition was pending before it. |   In fact the high court was to   hear the petition on April 18 and thus the FTC ruling came just a day   before.The court issued the   directive within hours after Darash pronounced the verdict. The court also asked   Darash to file a showcause reply by May 11. The court posted the matter for   hearing on May 15 and issued notices to the MP and his son in this   connection.Earlier in the day,   Darash acquitted Uma Shankar and Swami of the charge of murdering Bharat Singh,   the brother of sitting JD(U) MLA from Maharajganj Damodar Singh, for want of   enough evidence.Swami and Uma Shankar   were accused of kidnapping and murdering Bharat Singh during the Assembly   election on February 17, 2000. Vijay Singh, another sibling of Damodar and   Bharat, had lodged an FIR with Maharajganj police station against   them.Uma Shankar was on   bail since then. Swami was in Siwan jail for the past seven years. In fact Uma   was then the leader of Samata Party (earlier version of Janata Dal United) in   the state Assembly and Damodar Singh was contesting as an Independent. Uma was   also the candidate of Samata Party from Maharajganj then. It was later that he   crossed over to RJD and won the MP election by defeating Prabhunath Singh of   Janata Dal (United) in May 2009 Lok Sabha   election.Ironically,   Prabhunath joined RJD in August 2010. This angered Uma Shankar Singh and he   campaigned against his own party in the 2010 Assembly   election. The counsel for   Vijay, Prabhakar Singh, on Tuesday brought the development at the Siwan   Fast-Track Court to the notice of Justice Amanullah. He said Vijay had filed a   petition before the district and sessions judge of Siwan seeking transfer of the   case from the Fast-Track Court-I, as he had seen the judge (Darash) having a   meal with the accused. The district court on March 16 had dismissed the transfer   plea. An appeal was filed against the order in the high court, which had fixed   the date for hearing the petition on April 18.   According to senior   advocates the Fast-Track Court’s decision is “judicial indiscipline”, as a   transfer petition was filed in the high court. The high court might take   disciplinary action or initiate inquiry against the judge concerned. It may also   ask the judge to opt for compulsory retirement or dismiss him. 
       comments... |  
   |