| 
      
        | 
            
            
            
            
            
                       |   
          
          
          
          Patna,(BiharTimes):   The Janata Dal (United) seems to be confused over how to use former President A   P J Abdul Kalam’s forthcoming book “Turning Point And Journey Through   Challenges” for its own end. While its spokesman,   Neeraj Kumar, on Saturday chose to ask the UPA and RJD to apologise to former   President for “pressurizing” him to sign on dotted lines on a cabinet decision   recommending dissolution of the state legislative Assembly constituted after   February 2005 Assembly polls in Bihar his party chief Sharad Yadav chose to   speak on some other issue and did not attach much importance to book itself.  |  
	  
	  
      
      
        
        Sharad, who is also   National Democratic Alliance (NDA) convenor, on the other hand, chose to speak   on the Sonia Gandhi episode, which has also been discussed in the book. He said   had Kalam spoken this in 2004, it would have carried a different level of moral   force. The remarks do not carry that kind of moral force now as his revelation   came eight years after the event had played out. The relevance it had at that   time does not exist today, he added. But Neeraj told   reporters in Patna that both the UPA government and the RJD supremo Lalu Prasad   should realize their mistakes and apologise to Kalam for forcing him to sign on   the Centre’s decision to dissolve the legislative   Assembly. It needs to be   recalled that the Feb 2005 election gave a fractured verdict while it was in Nov   2005 poll that Nitish Kumar led NDA got comfortable   majority. Neeraj said that it   was a matter of concern that Kalam stood embarrassed following the Supreme   Court's observations while setting aside dissolution of the state Assembly   constituted after 2005 Assembly polls. It remained a mystery   as to why Janata Dal (United) chose Neeraj Kumar to speak on the issue of   national importance while Sharad diluted the whole issue sitting in New Delhi.   Has Shivanand Tiwary, the national spokesman of the party, still not been   allowed to speak much? Or is there something else?  But there is another   opinion too. When all these were going on in 2005 Shivanand Tiwary was strongly   with the Rashtriya Janata Dal. As the spokesman of that party he was supporting   Lalu Yadav as ferociously then as he used to do in case of Nitish Kumar   now.    
       |