|  | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
            
            
                       |   
          
          
          
          New Delhi, July 16 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday admitted a   Bihar government plea challenging the acquittal of 23 accused in the massacre of   20 Dalits by the Ranvir Sena in Bathani Tola in Bhojpur district in   1996.
 An apex court bench of Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice J.   Chelameswar admitted the plea and issued notice to the acquitted accused.
 
 
 |  
	  
	  
      
      
        
        The trial court had convicted all the 23 accused and had awarded death sentence   to three. However, all of them were acquitted by the Patna High   Court.
 The case related to the killing of 20 Dalits by members of the   Ranvir Sena when they attacked village Bathani Tola July 11, 1996 in Bhojpur   district, some 100 km from state capital Patna.
 
 The Bihar government in   its petition said that the "high court has failed to appreciate the evidence led   by the prosecution in its correct perspective" and it "resulted in grave   miscarriage of justice and deserved to be set aside".
 
 The government   challenged the high court's April 16 verdict acquitting all the accused,   including three who were awarded death sentence by the trial court.
 
 The   trial court May 5, 2010 convicted 23 and acquitted 30 accused. The convicts were   found guilty of rioting and murder.
 
 The government's petition filed by   counsel Abhinav Mukherjee contended that the high court "failed to consider any   of the reasons advanced by the trial court in its well reasoned and detailed   judgment".
 
 The petition said that the impugned orders "disregarded the   evidence of the prosecution witnesses only on account of minor discrepancies and   failed to apply the law" declared by the apex court in several   cases.
 
 Referring to earlier judgments of the apex court, the petition   said that "there would hardly be a witness whose evidence does not contain some   amount of exaggeration or embellishment, sometimes there would be a deliberate   attempt to offer the same and sometimes the witnesses in their over-anxiety to   do better from the witness-box detail out an exaggerated account".
 
 
    
	
	
       |