|  | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
          
           |   
          
          
          
          New Delhi/Kolkata, June 8 (IANS) A Delhi High Court ruling that   a Muslim girl can marry once she attains the age of puberty has sharply split   the community, with clerics backing the law and virtually everyone else against   it.
 |  Muslim religious leaders across the country are pleased with the court edict   that based its judgement on the Sharia, the moral code and religious law of   Islam. While criminal laws in India apply to all equally, communities are   allowed their own personal laws. 
 "According to Mohammedan law, a girl   can marry without the consent of her parents once she attains the age of   puberty," Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and S.P. Garg said recently.
 
 The   bench was ruling on a Delhi Muslim girl's contention that she had married on her   own free will when she was 15 years old and that her mother's charge that she   had been abducted be dropped. She won the case.
 
 Well-known Bengali writer   Syed Mustafa Siraj is amongst those who are shocked that a court has given legal   sanction for puberty-marriage when the official minimum age to wed in India is   18 for females and 21 for males.
 
 "A lot of girls attain puberty at age   12. Does it mean they can be married off when they are barely 12-13? I protest   against this ruling," Siraj told IANS in Kolkata.
 
 Bangalore-based writer   Farida Rahamatullah agreed: "Whatever the personal laws of Muslims, Hindus or   Christians, it is a crime to let a 15-year-old girl marry and begin a family   life when she ought to be studying, playing and dreaming of a career and a   job.
 
 "In fact the law courts should protect the girls and ensure they   exercise the right to marry or not till they turn major at 18 years. Fifteen is   too young an age to decide their future as they will be immature, indulgent and   vulnerable to the hazards of a family life."
 
 Patna-based Maulana Anisur   Rahman Qasmi, however, hailed the ruling. "There is nothing wrong in it," he   said.
 
 Raheem Quraishi, assistant secretary of the All India Muslim   Personal Law Board, echoed him. "It is a right decision."
 
 The Board has   been demanding an amendment to the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act to exempt   Muslims from it. Under the Shariat Application Act, marriage is one subject   where the Sharia should be applicable.
 
 The Board has also been impleaded   in a case with the Bombay High Court in which parents were booked by police for   marrying off their 17-year-old daughter.
 
 "I respect the high court's   order," added Mufti Mohammed Mukarram Ahmed, the Shahi Imam of the Fatehpuri   Masjid in Old Delhi. "As per Muslim Personal Law, a 15-year-old girl can   marry."
 
 But they appeared to be isolated with a large majority of urban   Muslims as outraged as Syed Mustafa Siraj and Farida Rahamatullah.
 
 "This   is totally wrong," cried out Mohammad Shabbir Ansari, an engineer at Noida,   which borders Delhi.
 
 Homemaker Nazia Umar told IANS: "I am not at all in   favour of this decision. Whatever reasons a court may give, Islam does not allow   anything that hurts anyone. A 15-year-old is not ready for   marriage."
 
 Noorjahan Safafia Niaz, founder member of the Bharatiya Muslim   Mahila Andolan in Mumbai, backed them.
 
 "A 15-year-old girl might have   reached puberty but she might not be emotionally mature or ready for marriage,"   she said.
 
 Taha Moheen, president of the Bangalore Islamic Foundation,   warned that the judgement could lead to exploitation and set a bad   precedent.
 
 He also pointed out that the number of such marriages had   declined, especially in urban areas, due to awareness and interventions by   community leaders and religious heads opposed to child   marriages.
 
 According to the Sharia, a Muslim girl can marry once she   attains puberty. Keeping this in view, the British permitted Muslims to marry   their daughters when they were 15.
 
 Subsequent governments increased the   age of marriage for all communities to 18 and then came the Prohibition of Child   Marriage Act. The Board wants Muslims to be exempt from this law.
 
 Abdul   Azeem, a postgraduate student in Hyderabad, was in favour of the ruling but   warned that the Sharia can't be interpreted in bits and pieces.
 
 "The   court has said only one part of the Sharia. There are also 'ahadith' (sayings of   Prophet Mohammed) that a marriage is not valid without the consent of 'vali' or   custodian of the girl.
 
 "Such one-sided verdicts promote vices. This could   encourage girls to violate the limitations set by Sharia, develop illicit   relations and revolt against parents."
 
 Aziz Mubaraki, secretary to the   Shahi Imam of Kolkata's Tipu Sultan Mosque, went a step further: "We feel the   court should not involve itself in religious matters. We will be guided by the   tenets of Islam. We will go by our religious norms, even if there is an   overlapping court ruling."
 
 |