|  | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
          
           |   
          
          
          
          New Delhi, March 16 (IANS) It has made all the right noises   about the need to reform and prune subsidies, and even extends incentives to tax   payers. But without targets, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee's 7th union   budget remains a manuscript of good intentions for the Indian economy.
 |  Yes, each of India's 35 million tax payers stands to gain at least Rs.2,000   ($40) annually and some among them will benefit from the revision in income tax   slabs. Many also stand to profit from the new scheme that provides incentives on   investment in equities.
 But all these minor gains get wiped out by the   hike of 2 percentage points in virtually every service, as also the revision in   the standard excise duty rate from 10 percent to 12 percent, which Mukherjee   proposes in the budget tabled in the Lok Sabha Friday.
 
 That leaves one to   turn to the other aspects of the budget -- fiscal consolidation, how to nurse   the economy back into shape, lower the subsidy bill and kick-start the reforms   programme that seems to lie in state for quite some time now.
 
 Here, the   budget is full of just promises. Mukherjee himself says there is need to "bite   the bullet" but does not actually do so in a clear sign that his Congress paty   has been unable to convince the allies within the United Progressive Alliance   (UPA) government.
 
 In fact, there were great expectations, not just   because the UPA's second stint is well past the mid-way mark of its tenure, but   also since this national budget will run co-terminus with the first year of the   country's 12th Five Year Plan.
 
 The Economic Survey, authored by finance   ministry's Chief Economic Advisor Kaushik Basu, and the monetary policy review   of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had also prescribed a host of measures to   ensure high growth for the Indian economy. But there appears to be little action   on them.
 
 There is no timeline for introducing a pan-India goods and   services tax and direct tax code. There is only a reiteration of intention to   introduce bills to open up pension, insurance and banking sectors. On black   money, he just promises a white paper.
 
 Even on subjects like allowing   foreign airlines to particpate in the domestic aviation sector and overseas   capital into multi-brand retailing, there is the same, all-familiar line: The   government is trying to build consensus among difficult and ideologically   incompatible allies and decision will be taken soon.
 
 So when the Sensex   fell 200 points Friday, it was no surprise.
 
 Let us also look at fiscal   consolidation. At 5.1 percent of gross domestic product, the fiscal deficit is   alarmingly high. While Mukherjee argues it is lower than the revised estimate of   5.9 percent for this fiscal, it is well above 4.6 percent projected   earlier.
 
 But there are, indeed, positive sides to the budget, especially   on the issue of helping the corporate sector raise funds at competitive rates   globally, higher allocations for infrastructure development and social sectors,   and an affirmation on pruning subsidies.
 
 The finance minister also says   the subsidy bill will be brought down to 2 percent of GDP and further down to   1.75 percent over the next three years, while also promising direct transfer of   food, fertiliser and fuel doles to the intended beneficiaries.
 
 Yet, given   his own initial assessment that the Indian economy was clearly on the road of   recovery with growth pegged at 7.6 percent for the next fiscal, and that   inflation would be lower next year, one expected much, much more from the   $300-billion budget.
 
 "Whether or not today's announcements make tomorrow   morning's headlines matters little, as long as they help in shaping the   headlines that describe India a decade from now," the finance minister said in   conclusion of his 110-minute speech.
 
 Perhaps, as a veteran of seven   budgets, Mukherjee knew how the news will be played out. On that count, Railway   Minister Dinesh Trivedi was better off. With a fare hike, he did what others did   not dare for past 10 years -- knowing well he was going to lose his job.
 
 comments... |  
   |