|  | 
      
        | 
            
            
            
          
           |   
          
          
          
          New Delhi, March 19 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Monday quashed   charges of hosting objectionable content against Microsoft India and set aside a   trial court order for initiating criminal proceedings against the company for   lack of evidence.Setting aside the proceedings, Justice Suresh Kait   said: "There is no evidence on record against the petitioner."
 
 |  Justice Kait accepted the company's plea that Microsoft was not providing a   platform to people to interact with each other and post or publish their views,   but one engaged in development and sale of software and computing   solutions.
 The company's counsel told the court that no defamatory   material was posted on its websites, and Microsoft India is not a social   networking site or search engine.
 
 The move came as Microsoft India   approached the high court, challenging the trial court's order initiating   criminal proceedings against it for hosting "obscene and derogatory   content".
 
 The high court also gave the complainant Vinay Rai liberty to   file a fresh complaint if any credible piece of evidence was found against the   company.
 
 The company in its petition submitted that there is not even an   iota of evidence against the Microsoft India. "Still no offence whatsoever is   disclosed against the company."
 
 "The complaint is wholly false and   malicious and has been lodged with an ulterior motive to cause harassment and to   blackmail the company and other officers of the company," the petition said   while seeking quashing of proceedings against it.
 
 Rai had approached the   trial court to remove objectionable content from 21 websites, including   Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Yahoo and YouTube. Among these, 12 websites are of   companies based abroad.
 
 Metropolitan Magistrate Sudesh Kumar had summoned   the companies to face trial for allegedly committing offences punishable under   the Indian Penal Code sections 292 (sale of obscene books and material) and 293   (sale of obscene objects to young persons).
 
 The trial court observed that   the material submitted by the complainant contained obscene pictures and   derogatory articles pertaining to Hindu deities, Prophet Muhammad and Jesus   Christ.
 
 comments... |  
   |