Food security has been a significant  concern for Bihar even before the outbreak of COVID-19. According to the 2020-21, Composite SDG Index by  NITI Aayog, Bihar ranks lowest with score 52as against the highest score of 75  for Kerala among the states in India. Bihar stood the second last with score 31  and is only above Jharkhand (19) in terms of SDG 2. Covid-19 is likely  to aggravate the food and nutrition status of the already vulnerable population  and undermine the efforts put to achieve SDG 2 of Zero Hunger. Telephonic  survey was conducted in seven districts of Bihar with support from International  Growth Center (IGC) to collect the information on consumption of food groups  before the pandemic and the current period based on the recall method (12  months, 7 days, and 24 hours),allow us to analyze the food security challenges  faced by the vulnerable households in rural Bihar since the pandemic. The  following findings are emerged from the survey:
  
    - Drastic Reduction in Number  of Days of Consumption of Food Groups
- Except for food groups’ cereals, oils and  spices, there has been a drastic reduction in household consumption of other food  items. 
- Consumption of meat reduced by 83 percent; fruits and eggs by 75 percent and pulses by 60 percent since the  pandemic. The likely reasons for this reduction are fear of corona, price hike  and closure of markets.  
- Consumption of fish declined by 38% due to fish being expensive and  partially due to fear of corona.
- Even consumption of roots and tubers and green/yellow leafy vegetables  dwindled by 32% and 18% respectively, likely due to a hike in the price of  products followed by non-availability of the items.
  
   
  Fig  1A: Consumption of Food Groups                   Figure 1B: Supply-Side Constraint in Accessing Average no of Days/ Month                                       Food
  
 
 
  
    - Unevenly  Affected the Food and the Nutrition Security of the Marginalized Households and  also the Children
 
  
    - In  terms of households dietary diversity i.e number of food groups consumed in a  day is much lower among the casual worker households and migrant worker  households than salaried households. The percentage of households having  consumed more than 6 food groups is 12 percentage point lesser among casual  wage households and 10 percentage point lesser among the migrant households  compared to the salaried households. 
- Children  have also been severely affected in casual and migrant households. The vast  majority of the children consumed only cereals and vegetables mostly potatoes  in a week in the majority of the casual and migrant households since pandemic.  Children consumed pulses, fruits, and non-vegetarian items once in seven days  since the pandemic. This will aggravate the malnutrition status of the children  in the long run. 
  
   
  Figure 2A: Households Dietary  Diversity                   Figure 2B:  Food Frequency of a Child
  
 
 
   
  
    - Shortage of Food is the  Sources of Worry Since Pandemic
- Approximately  3 in 5 households were worried about not having enough food to eat as well as  worried that they would not be able to eat a healthy and diverse variety of  food item since the COVID-19 outbreak. 
- One-fourth  of the households depended only on a limited type of food items. More than  two-fifth of the households ate less amount of food. 
- Around 12  percent of the households skipped a meal and 11 percent of the households also  felt hungry. 
- Some of  the households (5 percent) also reported that they spent the entire day without  eating
 
  Figure 3:  Self Assessed Household Food Insecurity 
   
 
  Effectiveness  of the Government programme
  
  One of the relief measures announced  included the free provision of an additional ration of 5 kg of wheat or rice  per person and one kg of pulses per household per month to all ration card  holders under the Public Distribution System (PDS). This was over and above  their regular entitlement under the National Food Security Act. Around 20  percent of the households did not have a ration card and hence, were  automatically excluded as they did not meet the eligibility criteria to benefit  from the relief measure. PDS plays a major role in terms of maintaining  household food security at the time of a pandemic. According to the respondents  compared to the normal period PDS ration supports the households in a much  better way to mitigate the food shortage during the pandemic. Almost one fourth  of the respondents feel PDS ration support more than 3 weeks of requirements as  against only 1 percent opined the same in the normal period.   
  Figure4A:  Support from PDS Figure4B: THR supports for child nutrition
  

  
  On the contrary role of  ICDS in providing child nutritional supplement got disturbed due to the  disruption in the functioning of the AWC during the pandemic. Almost half of  the eligible households did not receive the supplementary food or Take Home  Ration. Among the households who have received THR, one in four beneficiaries received  them rarely, and approximately two out of ten beneficiaries received them sometimes.  As expected 8 out of 10 eligible beneficiary quoted that supplementary  nutrition supports an insignificant portion due to the irregular supply of THR.
  Maintaining a healthy nutritious diet  is essential to support a strong immune system to fight the pandemic. However  rural Bihar is facing challenging tradeoff between COVID-19 and food  availability, access and livelihood. Although  government of India has announced several relief package large proportion of  the households received the amount much lower than the announced amount. Larger  proportion of the households also excluded from the benefit although they were  eligible to receive it. Sustainable intervention by the government is needed to  smooth the availability and accessibility of the food to maintain the proper  dietary diversity of the households during the pandemic.  Strengthening Social protection scheme is a  key to improve the access to food, nutrition, essential services particularly  for the marginalized and vulnerable households during any economic shocks. The  findings of this study suggest that there is a need for cash transfer to the  beneficiaries' accounts in case of ICDS or Mid-day meal scheme where  beneficiaries could not receive the Take Home Ration due to disruption of the  AWC and the closure of the school.  Also,  there is an immediate requirement to increase the manpower to the AWC for  smooth functioning of their routine work otherwise that have long term  implication on the child and pregnant and lactating mothers’ nutrition. 
   
  (The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the  authors)
  Authors:
  
    
      |  
 Dr. Swati Dutta,  Fellow, Institute for Human Development,    New Delhi   |  
 Dr. Sunil Kumar Mishra,  Fellow, Institute for Human Development,    New Delhi    |  
 Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Programme Officer,    Institute for Human Development, Ranchi   |