27/08/2013

 

Animal Studies Paint Misleading Picture

 

Maneka Sanjay Gandhi

 

(Bihar Times) When I was young, every school had to cut up animals to learn biology. Years later, the education system realized that cutting animals harmed the child. So schools were ordered to stop it.

 Zoology dissection has been stopped by order of the UGC. Even medical colleges have realized that cutting animals by undergraduate students makes no sense and are planning to stop it. Pharmacy and dental colleges have already stopped it. In a few years dissection will become a horrible memory.

 Now come to the so called research for a great medical breakthrough. India just has one patent. But millions of animals have been killed by so called researchers. In fact, after all the killing and their monthly salary, few even write up the experiments on animals. The premier Medical Journal Lancet says that only 2% of research in India is written up and submitted for review.

 Indian researchers are not the only fakers in the field.

 Every few days I see some new headline in the paper about a new cure for cancer. When I read the article it says that some breakthrough has been made when testing animals. Months later the “breakthrough” has failed in clinical trials on humans and is abandoned. The researchers get their grants and after a few days another study will start. Lakhs of animals are dead but 90% of the researchers achieve nothing.

 And they cannot. Animal testing leads nowhere. Can a test on a human be applicable to a rat? No. So why should medicines that work on rats be applicable to humans?

 My scepticism is borne out by an amazing 2010 University of Edinburgh study which has found that published animal trials tend to overestimate the likelihood that a medical treatment will work by about 30% or more.

 Researchers suggest that the main cause for this is because negative results during animal trials often go unpublished.

 Based on analysis of 525 “breakthrough” studies on strokes including 1,359 experiments and 16 different treatments, researchers found that only about a third of these results were even reproducible in human trials. A major overstatement of efficiency has become par for the course.

 Why are researchers telling lies?

 Researchers suffer from “Publication Bias”. They know that negative or neutral results are not interesting enough to be published or talked about. However when positive results are obtained from an animal trial they will get published - in journals, review articles, textbooks, courses - leading to fame for the researcher amongst his peers and making his viewpoint the “truth”. But if data is not published because it is negative or differs substantially from published work, then the researcher has to find something else to do.

 The Study reported that only 10 publications (2%) printed research that was negative. Only 6 had reports that did not make some significant new claim. 214 experiments apart from the 1359 which found negative findings in the same area were not printed at all.

 Non-publication of data raises ethical concerns, first because the animals used have not contributed to the sum of human knowledge, and second because participants in clinical trials may be put at unnecessary risk if efficacy in animals has been overstated. But because the truth is hidden, animal testing continues in the life sciences and medical research. If researchers knew the truth – that a great deal of research fails because of the animal models used – then they would look for alternatives. We may even find the actual cures for diseases like cancer that we are pretending to treat now.

 The impact of publication bias in basic research has not previously been quantified. The Edinburgh research has for the first time shown that publication bias is prevalent in reports of laboratory-based research in animal models to the extent that as many as one in seven experiments remain unpublished and reviews of the results of interventions in animals overstate their efficacy by around one third.

 Misleading or one sided research data can go on compounding the problem, leading new researchers down the garden path as they attempt to build on already published data. Let me explain it simply:

 Ten experiments take place that say colouring a rat’s ears can cure cancer. Nine say that it has no effect on the disease at all. None of these nine experiments are published. But the tenth which says that colouring the ears of a rat MAY have some effect on cancer will be published as a “breakthrough”. New researchers only see this one published article. So they get put in years trying to find out which other ear colours could cure cancer. If they had read the unpublished works they would have abandoned this line of research altogether instead of further unnecessary animal experiments testing poorly founded theories.

 Some safeguards are built into the system of information dissemination by making a published article open to review. But it is a hit and miss method with “experts” using review articles to emphasise their own particular perspective and again without digging into the data that has NOT been published.

 This is what the Edinburgh researchers say “ If experiments have been conducted but are not available to reviewers, as they are not the same as results from experiments that were published, then reviews, and the resulting expert opinion and public understanding, will be biased. This is the “file drawer problem”: at its most extreme, the 95% of studies that were neutral and reported no significant effects remain in the files of the investigators, while the 5% of experiments that were falsely positive are published, and reviewers conclude—falsely—that the literature represents biological truth.”

 If publication bias did not exist, at least one-third of animal-based experiments would have shown different results. In fact the Study says “We think that the present study is more likely to underestimate than to overestimate the effect of publication bias.”

 What are the reasons that researchers look for “positive hyped results, no matter what the truth is:

 1. First, there is likely to be more enthusiasm amongst scientists, journal editors, and the funders of research for positive rather than for neutral studies.

 2. The majority of animal based studies use only a few animals. Neutral studies therefore seldom have the statistical power confidently to exclude an effect that would be considered of biological significance, so they are less likely to be published than are similarly underpowered “positive” studies.

 How many animals were killed in those 214 experiments that were never reported? 3,600.

 What is the solution to this? A central register of experiments involving animals should be made so that anyone entering the field can access the number of experiments grouped along a broad subject. In England www.clinicaltrials.gov logs all clinical trials before they begin.

 The value of animal experiments for predicting the effectiveness of treatment strategies in clinical trials has remained controversial. Animal experiments may contribute to our understanding of mechanisms of disease, but their value in predicting the effectiveness of treatment strategies is extremely limited. Less than 10% even translate into clinical trials on humans. I could give you a list of thousands of medicines that worked in animals and failed in humans.

 The purpose of the Edinburgh study was to convince scientists and journals to publish rigorously conducted negative studies as well. If we publish all the times that experiments on animals have failed, we might get researchers to go to the track of serious science instead of wasting time.

 

To join the animal welfare movement contact gandhim@nic.in

Comment

 

previous articles...

Animal Studies Paint Misleading Picture

Are you alone?

What do you eat when you eat fish

How ANIMALS manage their time—A STUDY

Next time you look into your beloved’s soul, look for the parasites at the gateway...

Medicinal Use of Cow Urine

Influence of Animals on human beings

Cruel Ways of Eating Animals & Birds by Humans II

Cruel Ways of Eating Animals & Birds by Humans I

Are you a Good Samaritan?

How to Check Adulteration in Milk

Stable Environment for healthy fish needed

Fish Lovers- Beware

Role of Bacteria in shaping behavior of genes

A Suitable Cow

Some Tips On Nursing Puppies

Ban Battery cage for chicken

Varieties of Chicken we eat

Slaughter houses and increased crime rates

Breeds of dog in India

Cruelty to animals on the occasion of festivals

Real foods spoil very quickly, fast foods not

 The Myth of Swine & Avian Flu in India

Fish eating causes health hazard

Animal sacrifice in Pauri Garhwal area of Uttarakhand  

Difference between Veg and Non-veg

Virgin Mary among Lizards

Nature-the most inspiring model for our Ecosystems

Role of denial in eating of Meat

The Technology of Synthetic Milk

Honeybee-the insect for human food chain

 Why do dogs bark

Characteristics of varieties of caterpillars

Emotional Complexity of Animals

Meat eating causes diseases

Rat in Hindu mythology

Which animal you are

Man’s alter ego-an Animal

Career in management of welfare of Animals

Profession of  Pet grooming

What you Eat When you Eat Processed Meat

How to train a dog to make it useful

The Purpose of Minor Beings in Our Ecosystem

Cruelty to Bears in Pakistan

How  Onion Drives Away Viruses

How to save an animal from burn injury

Production of Honey is cruelty to Bee

Meat eating causes Global warming

Hazards of fish factories

Growth of a bird till it flies

Creatures of the world live and help live

Killing a snake brings bad luck

Effects of the startle Reflex on Animals

Awaken Your Soul by Loving Animals

Feeling of grief in Animals

Talking Plants

Altruism in Animals

Music Soothes Animals

How Animals recognize their Kins

Animals teach their offspring like human moms

Cruelty to Animals in Slaughter houses

What is the secret to a perfect life and happiness?

How is Ghee being adulterated ?

Difference between a man & an animal

Homosexuality Is Not Against Nature In Animal Kingdom

Programmes for improving Animal Welfare

Promiscuity in mating behaviour of Birds

Uses for slaughtered Animals accelerate killing of Animals

Slingshots & Catapults Destroy Wild Life

Human Intelligibility of Animals

Animal grooming of offspring is worth emulating

Illegal Trade of Killing Cattle

Eating Cattle Meat Causes E Coli Infection

Some tips on making  Puppies’ life comfortable

Some tips on keeping kittens clean

Snake skin trade dangerous for eco system

Dog shows are not for dog lovers but for moneymakers and charlatans

Political agenda for Animal welfare needed

How foolish it is to kill Sea creatures for Ornaments

Infectious diseases from Animals to Humans

How pitiable is Rabbit farming?

Remedies for Animal ailments

Infected Pig Meat Risks Your Life

Animals spread dangerous Ebola virus to humans

Animals Have More Sense

Municipal Policy on hazards of pet shops

Mutualism  makes Species of the nature flourish

Adoption Fair for Puppies

How Animals behave in packs

Why People prefer dogs and cats to human beings

Positive effects of spaying and neutering on pets

Mammals & Birds cry like human beings

Biomemetics Provides solution to human problems

Chinese food products- the greatest killer

Pets make better partners than humans

How harmful is the Packaged Meat

Stop Slaughter of Cows for Bone Trade

How cruel it is to dump pet animals ? view comments...

Don’t hurt animals on festive occasions

Let the earth beings survive

Glues are made of animal remains

Meat increases risk of cancer

Birds provide springboard to song composers

Is it not an act of Cannibalism?

How many animals do you have to eat before you become man ?

To eat or not to eat Meat

Insulin from Animals 

Is It Healthy Decision to Promote Rat Eating in Bihar

Use of Animal bones in Porcelain

Infection of Tick disease in Dogs and its cure

Vegetarian diet is the best diet for human beings

Non-Veg  Diet causes  Dementia

Excuses for being non-vegetarians

Body odour of Non-vegetarians

Feeling Good

MEAT threatens Planet’s Survival

Am I smarter than you ? Yes, if you are a meat eater.

Need to  orient educational system to deal with animals

How to Avoid Cruelty to Gold Fish?

How To Make Everyday An Animal day

Are Eggs Vegetarian?

Are You One of these People ?

Use of Animal Fats in Cosmetics Industries

Killing of endangered Species for Perfume Industries

Missionary Campaign to Control Cruelty to Animals- needed

Drink Milk, Get Sick

Parents Create Monsters

The Business of Murder:Factory Farming and the Meat Industry in India

Effect of landscaping of birds on environment

Dangers of killing deep Sea-Sharks for  Cosmetic Products

Use of dog in diagnosis of diseases

Sacred Nature of Neelkanth

Cruelty to Polo Ponies comments...

Self-Regulation of Population by Animals

Dangers of Animal meat eating

Arsenic poison in chicken feed

Cruelty to Animals by Govt. Vets

Worship of God with Blood and Suffering of Animals and Birds

Consequences of Chloramphenicol in Shrimp Industry

Hazards of Trade in Peacocks’ Feather

Supreme Court Ban on cruelty to Animals

Are you a Bad Pet Owner?

The Goat That Laughed and Wept

Animal Owners’ personality traits resemble their Pets’

Human Propensities of Goat

Animal sacrifice at the altar of religion

Animal as foster parent

Animal feed from rendering plant

Trade in WildLife

Human Intelligence of Birds

Human Propensities of Cow